ArticleCureus2025
Evaluating Improvement in the Documentation of Patient Progress Notes Through the BSOAP Framework: A Clinical Audit.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Medical documentation is defined as the manual or electronic writing of health-related information of specific patients. It is a crucial process in patient care that ensures transparency, safety, and continuity of care. This audit aims to evaluate and improve the practice of progress notes documentation using the BSOAP (Background, Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) framework. Methodology A retrospective-prospective, three-cycle clinical audit was conducted between March and November 2024 in the pediatric department at Dongola Specialized Hospital. A total of 511 morning follow-ups were evaluated. Intervention included local presentation after each cycle, small group discussion, visual reminders, and supervision. Results According to the component, the least documented was the plan. The least documented parameter was discussion and patient education, followed by new investigation requests and review of relevant systems. The most documented parameter was vital signs, followed by patient age. The second and third cycles showed improvement in all components, with higher improvement noted between the second and third cycles. All progress notes in the second and third cycles used a BSOAP-based approach. Conclusions Implementation of the BSOAP framework as a structured tool, combined with targeted training and supervision, led to notable improvement in documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.