ArticleCureus2025
Improving the Acute Management of Ureteric Stones in a District General Hospital: A Two-Phase Quality Improvement Study Evaluating Practice Against NICE NG118 and GIRFT Recommendations.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUreteric colic is one of the most common urological emergencies. Adherence to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline NG118 and the Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) recommendations can improve care delivery by reducing unnecessary stenting and facilitating timely definitive management. However, implementation in district general hospitals may vary due to logistical constraints.
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate current compliance with NICE NG118 and GIRFT standards in the acute management of ureteric stones at a UK district general hospital and to assess the impact of targeted interventions on adherence to these guidelines between two audit cycles.
methodsA retrospective two-phase audit was conducted: Phase 1 (Aug-Nov 2023) and Phase 2 (Jul-Sep 2024). Data were collected on adults admitted with ureteric stones, including demographics, imaging, analgesia, treatment modality, stent use, and follow-up. Interventions between phases included creating a primary ureteroscopy (URS) and day-case extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) pathway, an electronic stent recall protocol, Cerner auto-text discharge summaries, departmental poster and oral presentations, and clinician education. Outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests (significance threshold: p<0.05).
resultsA total of 154 patients were included (Phase 1: 89; Phase 2: 65). CT kidneys, ureters, and bladder (KUB) within 24 hours improved from 98% to 100%. Urgent intervention within 48 hours increased significantly (from 35% to 53%, p=0.028), while non-indicated stent placements decreased (from 83% to 57%, p=0.001). Lost stent follow-up reduced from two to 0 patients (p=0.042), and hot clinic follow-up loss dropped from 16 to one patient (p<0.001). Serum calcium testing improved (from 47% to 66%, p=0.021), and dietary counselling rates rose from 17% to 72% (p<0.001). Conservative management attempts declined (from 65% to 46%, p=0.019), with failure rates reducing from 38% to 23% (p=0.044).
conclusionStructured multidisciplinary interventions led to significant improvements in guideline adherence. The introduction of IT solutions, electronic recall systems, and same-day treatment pathways reduced unnecessary interventions and enhanced continuity of care. Incorporating predictive tools such as the MIMIC score into CT reporting could further optimise early stratification and decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.