ArticleCureus2025
Attitudes, Willingness, and Barriers Among Hospital Pharmacists Toward Artificial Intelligence Integration in Pharmacy Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are increasingly being adopted in different healthcare sectors. Hospital pharmacists are an essential part of the multidisciplinary patient care team, and their perception of AI-driven technology is significant. This study aims to assess hospital pharmacists' perspectives on the use of AI in pharmacy practice, focusing on their attitudes, willingness, and perceived challenges. Methods An observational cross-sectional study was conducted using a web-based survey for hospital pharmacists working at Hamad Bin Khalifa Medical City (HBKMC), Qatar. The survey collected data on sociodemographics, willingness, attitudes, and barriers toward AI technology. The research questionnaire was developed and adopted based on an extensive literature review of similar studies, with minor changes to fit the current research setting. Descriptive data were reported. Chi-square (χ²) and Fisher's Exact tests were used as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Ninety-three (66.4%) hospital pharmacists responded to the questionnaire. Around 59 (63.4%) of the participants were older than 35 years, with 66 (70.9%) having more than 5 years of experience in hospital settings. Participants demonstrated a positive willingness, with a median score of 50 (IQR: 42-53.5), and favorable attitudes, with a median score of 53 (IQR: 47-57), toward AI implementation in pharmacy practice. The highest willingness to adopt AI technology among respondents was in the area of enhancing patient adherence (79.6%, n = 47), while the strongest positive attitude reflected interest in staying updated on AI applications in pharmacy practice (89.2%, n = 83). The most commonly reported barriers were challenges in addressing patients' emotional well-being and insufficient AI training, both noted by 75.3% (n = 70) of pharmacists. No significant association was detected between sociodemographic factors and hospital pharmacists' willingness or attitudes toward AI integration (p-value > 0.05). Conclusion Generally, hospital pharmacists demonstrated a positive willingness and attitude toward applications of AI technologies, while emphasizing key challenges such as concerns about the loss of empathetic care and limited training. These findings underline the need for targeted educational programs to facilitate the AI digital transformation of the health organization. Future research to evaluate the long-standing effects of AI-related training and implementation on a broader institutional setting is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.