Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951066›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Advances in Data-Driven Early Warning Systems for Sepsis Recognition and Intervention in Emergency Care: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Outcomes.

Abdulkreem Al-Juhani, Rodan Desoky, Ziyad Iskander, Khalid T Alshehri, Abdulaziz A Alshehri, Amaal Almuhaimid, Nouf L Alharbi, Reham H Mominah, Feda M Al-Humoud, Abdalrahman Desoky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdulkreem Al-JuhaniForensic Medicine, Forensic Medicine Center, Jeddah, SAU.
Rodan DesokyMedicine, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU.
Ziyad IskanderPreventive Medicine, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, SAU.
Khalid T AlshehriEmergency Medicine, Al Aziziyah Children Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdulaziz A AlshehriMedicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Amaal AlmuhaimidMedicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, SAU.
Nouf L AlharbiEmergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Reham H MominahEmergency Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Feda M Al-HumoudEmergency Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdalrahman DesokyMedicine, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition, and early recognition in the emergency department (ED) is crucial for reducing mortality. However, traditional ED sepsis screening tools (e.g., Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA)) often lack sensitivity for early detection. Machine learning (ML)-based early warning systems have been proposed to address this gap by analyzing complex clinical data in real time. To address this, we systematically reviewed studies (2015-2025) assessing ML-based sepsis warning systems in adult EDs. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Included studies reported diagnostic performance and/or clinical outcomes. Overall, a total of 11 studies (primarily retrospective, with a few prospective) were included. ML models using vital signs, laboratory results, and electronic health record (EHR) data demonstrated high discrimination for sepsis, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values often exceeding 0.80, and outperformed traditional scoring tools. Many provided earlier warnings, often two to four hours before sepsis was clinically recognized. Implementation studies showed that ML-based alerts expedited treatment; one multi-center system reduced time to antibiotics by ~1.8 hours when alerts were promptly addressed. Some reports noted reduced organ failure and mortality. However, evidence of improved patient outcomes remains inconsistent, likely due to study heterogeneity and limited prospective validation. ML-based early warning systems show strong potential for improving sepsis recognition and treatment in EDs. Further multi-center trials are needed to confirm their impact on outcomes and guide safe implementation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical decision supportdiagnostic accuracyearly warning systemselectronic health recordsemergency departmentmachine learningreal-time monitoringsepsissepsis prediction

Identifiers

PMID40951066
PMCPMC12424518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.