ReviewCureus2025
Management of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Scoping Review of Contemporary Evidence and Emerging Approaches.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locally advanced prostate cancers (LAPC) are a clinical dilemma due to their biological heterogeneity and multiple algorithmic treatment options. Recent years have seen a great deal of progress in management, both in established methods and new modalities. This had led to a necessity to systematically map out existing evidence. This scoping review intends to systematically integrate and summarize the zeitgeist research in the area of the care of LAPC to advance the available knowledge, discuss emergent management strategies, and identify evidence needs in different healthcare settings. A scoping review was undertaken following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A primary study search was conducted on six electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Library) and gray literature sources published between 2013 and April 2025. The Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework guided the eligibility. Data were plotted and thematically synthesized into six key domains: hormonal therapy, radiotherapy innovations, surgical strategies, new systemic therapies, imaging improvements, and real-life evidence. Six studies were included, consisting of a randomized controlled trial, an observational study, and a diagnostic review. The main themes were the benefits of multimodal treatment, the impact of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and genomic profiling, and the role of second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors and regional disparities in access to treatments. Combination therapies showed oncologic benefits, but raised concerns about patients' quality-of-life outcomes. The management of LAPC is moving to a related precision-based, multimodal paradigm. Although current knowledge supports more aggressive and individualized therapy, there are still data gaps in long-term outcomes, global uptake, and patient-reported measures. Future research needs to be based on inclusive longitudinal studies that span between clinical innovation and real-world application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.