ReviewCureus2025
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mental Health Crises in Adolescents Using Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting mental health trajectories after potentially traumatic events: a machine learning approach.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Large language models in adolescent suicide prevention: from language signals to accountable action.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of suicide, self-harm, and mental crises among teenagers is rising, presenting significant global public health issues. Conventional clinical risk evaluations have inadequate predictive accuracy, often overlooking high-risk adolescents. Machine learning models employing electronic health records provide an innovative method for predicting mental health crises through the integration of intricate clinical data patterns. Hence, this review aims to comprehensively examine and synthesize information about machine learning models created using electronic health record data for predicting suicide attempts, self-harm, or mental hospitalization in teenagers. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) principles, we executed an exhaustive search across six databases (2000-2025) for peer-reviewed research utilizing machine learning algorithms on electronic health record data to predict adolescent mental health crises. The inclusion criteria emphasized structured or unstructured electronic health record inputs, teenage cohorts (ages 10-20), and performance indicators like area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, or specificity. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was utilized to evaluate the risk of bias. Our search yielded five studies (2019-2024) that satisfied the inclusion criteria. All studies were retrospective cohorts conducted in high-income nations. Structured electronic health record data (e.g., diagnoses, prescriptions) were frequently utilized; two studies included natural language processing. Machine learning models demonstrated moderate to high discrimination (AUC 0.68-0.88), exhibiting optimal performance in short-term suicide prediction with hybrid data inputs. All investigations, however, exhibited a significant risk of bias in the analysis domain owing to insufficient external validation and absent calibration data. The positive predictive values consistently remained modest across all models. Overall, machine learning models demonstrate potential for enhancing adolescent suicide risk classification utilizing electronic health record data, surpassing numerous traditional instruments. Nonetheless, issues of generalizability, ethical constraints, and implementation obstacles remain. Thorough validation, calibration, and equity assessments are necessary prior to incorporation into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.