ReviewPreventive medicine reports2025
Global situation of oral health coverage toward universal health coverage: A scoping review.
Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interprofessional oral health promotion in rural primary healthcare systems: a scoping review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Pooled it
- The Impact of Limited Access to Dental Care on Emergency Room Service Utilization: A Study of Primary Healthcare in a Rural Inland Region of Portugal.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Structural Accountability and Practice-Level Governance as Dual Pathways to Accreditation-Seeking Intention in Private Dental Practice: Evidence from a Mixed Public-Private Healthcare System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structural Embedding of Oral Health Within Pooled Universal Coverage Mechanisms: Where Are We in 2026?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A deep learning approach for the diagnosis and recurrence prediction of OKC.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Oral Health Trends and Challenges in North and West Africa: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Direct and Indirect Costs per Visit for Elderly Patients and Their Caretakers Receiving Complete Dentures in Health Region 9, Thailand.Health services insights · 2026Article
- Community water fluoridation policy and population oral health: a policy analysis.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the status of Universal Health Coverage in oral/dental services from the perspectives of population, service, and cost coverage, as well as other aspects of financing, using a scoping review. Method: A scoping review of published articles from 2000 to 2024 was conducted, utilizing scientific databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ProQuest, along with other sources such as grey literature and Google Scholar. Result: The initial search identified 58,778 articles, with 28 articles included in the final analysis after screening and full-text review. The included countries were Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, India, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, Ukraine, and the United States. The condition of oral health coverage was reported by factors such as dental health expenditure, coverage type, service and cost coverage, coverage of age/specific groups, and cost sharing. Conclusion: Dental services are mainly provided by the private sector, do not have adequate public coverage and are mainly financed by out-of-pocket payments. However, Dental health expenditure and coverage vary significantly across countries, influenced by diverse healthcare systems, economic conditions, and public health priorities. Countries like Sweden and the United Kingdom demonstrate strong public funding commitments, providing comprehensive coverage for preventive and basic services. In contrast, countries like Australia and the United States rely more on private insurance, leading to higher out-of-pocket costs for individuals. Addressing high out-of-pocket payments and ensuring equitable access to oral health care remain key challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.