ArticleHealth science reports2025
Evaluation of the Risk of Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Among Immigrant and Native-Born Women: A Retrospective Observational Analysis.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Although ethnic disparities in birth outcomes have been well documented, it is unclear whether certain immigrant groups have a higher risk of suffering from perinatal complications compared to native-born Spanish women. The objective of this study was to identify prenatal and perinatal complications among immigrant populations and residents of a region of Catalonia. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted among pregnant women in the Lleida health region between 2012 and 2018. Perinatal indicators of obstetric outcomes were compared between the immigrant and native-born Spanish population. The risk was calculated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A sample of 17,281 women, accounting for over 92% of the pregnant population in the Lleida health region, was analyzed. Among this sample, preeclampsia occurred in 2.4% of sub-Saharan women. They also presented the highest percentage of cesarean sections of 22.5%. Apgar score in the first minute < 7 was observed in 4.6% of newborns of sub-Saharan mothers compared to 2.3%-2.5% of the rest (other immigrant populations plus native populations). The populations from Latin America had a higher risk of cesarean sections (21.6%) and macrosomia (8.7%). Women from Eastern Europe had a lower percentage of cesarean sections (15.9%). The Maghreb population had a lower percentage of cesarean sections (15.5%) and a lower birth weight (3.2%). However, a higher macrosomia percentage of 10.7% was observed. Conclusions: Differences are observed in the risk during pregnancy and in the newborn between the immigrant and the national population. These data corroborate the exposure to greater risk by the immigrant population, a preventive approach and early treatment is necessary to avoid complications in the mother and the newborn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.