ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Bibliometric analysis of the no-reflow in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients post-percutaneous coronary intervention: unveiling research trends, collaborative networks, and therapies.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global research trends and prognostic risk factors for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2025.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Insufficient blood flow following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) presents a significant challenge in the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of the research landscape pertaining to the no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients who have undergone PCI. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on the absence of blood flow following STEMI PCI utilizing the Web of Science Core Collection database, covering the period from 2000 to 2025. Bibliometric indicators, co-occurrence analysis, and burst detection were employed through the use of VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R-bibliometrix tools. Results: The analysis included 1,101 publications authored by contributors from 60 countries and 1,811 institutions. China led in research output, contributing 255 articles, while Heart Center Leipzig GmbH was the most prolific institution. Thiele H, with an H-index of 26, emerged as the most influential author. Journals such as the Conclusions: This study comprehensively elucidated global collaboration patterns and the dynamic evolution of research trends in this research field. Keyword analysis revealed a shift in focus from conventional techniques to patient-centered care and personalized treatment strategies in precision medicine. These insights provided valuable guidance for researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.