ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Establishment and validation of a cough prediction model for lung cancer survivors after pulmonary resection based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 cohort studies.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative cough (POC) is a common complication following pulmonary resection, with an incidence of 25-50%. However, it often receives insufficient attention from clinicians. This study aimed to systematically identify the key risk factors associated with POC in lung cancer survivors and to develop and validate a predictive model to assess the likelihood of POC following pulmonary resection. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WANFANG DATA, and CNKI to identify relevant risk factors for POC. Additionally, a cohort of 5,570 patients who underwent pulmonary resection was used to develop and validate the predictive model. Statistically significant independent variables from the meta-analysis were incorporated into the model, with risk factors weighted based on their pooled odds ratios (ORs) and β-coefficients. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The meta-analysis included 23 cohorts with 5,360 patients, of whom 33.8% experienced POC. Significant risk factors identified were age ≥60 years, body mass index (BMI) <24 kg/m Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive, evidence-based predictive model for identifying lung cancer survivors at high risk of POC, offering valuable insights into its risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.