ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025
Cone beam computed tomography for navigational bronchoscopy.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy for lung cancer: bibliometric and visualized analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- The role of navigation bronchoscopy in the workup of lung lesions in lung transplant-eligible patients: A single-center case series.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Establishing a Cone Beam CT-Guided Bronchoscopy Program: A Stepwise Guide for Interventional Pulmonologists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- RoboticERJ open research · 2026Article
- Cryobiopsy at the dawn of fibrosis: unlocking early diagnosis and therapeutic windows.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The unified front: a multidisciplinary approach in the Era of uniportal thoracic surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Robotic-assisted and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for multi-focal lung cancers: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a revolutionary technology that is increasingly being used in interventional pulmonology for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary lesions, specifically small peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). CBCT systems can provide detailed three-dimensional (3D) imaging, allowing for 3D lesion as well as instrument positioning information. Currently, only the fixed CBCT systems have been studied as a tool to not only provide 3D scanning information but also allow overlaying information on live fluoroscopy by a feature called augmented fluoroscopy. Using this combination of scanning and augmentation, CBCT can be used as a modality that provides both imaging and guidance in navigation to target lesions in navigation bronchoscopy. Studies have shown that the addition of CBCT to navigation bronchoscopy using other primary navigation guidance techniques can further increase the diagnostic yield of these technologies. The combination of CBCT with robotic assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is one of the most promising combinations, allowing pulmonologists to navigate complex airways with distal tip control along with detailed 3D positioning information to obtain biopsies and correct for computed tomography (CT)-to-body divergence. It is important for physicians to be properly trained in the use of CBCT, in order to obtain a high diagnostic yield with a low complication rate and to limit radiation exposure to the patient and employees. While further research is needed to fully examine its potential and address challenges, CBCT will likely become the standard of care technology for a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in interventional pulmonology. More research needs to be done on the added value and need of CBCT in combination with advanced procedural guidance techniques such as RAB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.