ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Predicting the progressive-free survival of ALK-positive lung cancer: machine learning algorithm based on habitat imaging.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity Analyzed by CT-Based Habitat Analysis for Clinical Management of Cancers: A Narrative Review.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer associated with the harbor oncogenic driver mutations or fusions, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), could benefit from representative clinical first-line treatment. And patients with ALK-positive (ALK+) show longer median survival than ALK-negative patients. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning model based on habitat analysis derived from computed tomography (CT) lung images to predict disease progression and explore its prognostic value for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with (ALK+) lung cancer. Methods: A total of 79 patients with ALK-positive lung cancer and advanced TNM stage (III-IV) at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between April 2016 and August 2022 were divided into training (n=63) and testing (n=16) cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from CT images using a habitat-based method with clustering analysis. Subsequently, the performance of eight machine learning algorithms was compared to build a habitat-radiomics (rad_habitat) model, yielding a rad_habitat_score. Using regression, we developed both a clinical model and a combined model that integrated clinical variables with the rad_habitat_score. Subsequently, these models' performance were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed on clinical variables and the rad_habitat_score. Results: Three distinct habitats were identified. Among the eight machine learning algorithms, the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model demonstrated superior performance in handling non-linearity, achieving a higher area under the curve (AUC) of 0.836 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.628-1.000] in the testing cohort. The combined model (AUC =0.836, 95% CI: 0.628-1.000) exhibited a higher AUC than the clinical model but a similar AUC to the rad_habitat model in the testing set. Delong test revealed a significant difference in the AUC values between the clinical model and the combined model and between the clinical model and rad_habitat model in the training cohort (P=0.002 and P=0.007, respectively), while the AUC values of the other models were not statistically different. Cox regression analysis identified the rad_habitat_score as the only independent predictor of PFS (P<0.001) for patients with high-risk ALK+ lung cancer. Conclusions: The habitat-radiomics approach, utilizing three regional habitats, shows promise for accurately and interpretably identifying disease progression in ALK+ lung cancer. The rad_habitat_score, when combined with clinical features, demonstrated improved predictive accuracy for prognostic stratification compared with the clinical model alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.