ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025
Updates in the management of malignant pleural effusion: a clinical practice review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Qualitative insights into patient and carer perspectives of malignant pleural effusion management: an embedded study within the TACTIC trial.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
- Renaissance of Traditional Mineral Drugs in Cancer: Advanced Delivery Strategies and Bioengineering Approaches.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Unraveling the multidimensional pleural ecosystem of lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Beyond Drainage: Can Pleural Effusion Naturally Tamponade Tumor Hemorrhage? Literature Review of Hypotheses for Possible Mechanisms.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Dry Pleural Dissemination from Rectal Cancer: A Case Report.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of a malignant pleural effusion (MPE) confers a poor prognosis, with a high burden of disabling symptoms due to altered respiratory mechanics and abnormal diaphragm function. Management is often palliative in nature, with the emphasis on preventing fluid re-accumulation. In the era of targeted therapies, pleural biopsies are often required for gene expression and receptor status profiling, for which local anaesthetic thoracoscopy provides the highest diagnostic yield. Interventions to achieve symptom control include thoracentesis, chest drain insertion, indwelling pleural catheters, medical thoracoscopy and surgery. The evidence base for these interventions has historically been lacking with a somewhat linear pathway, however, numerous well-designed, multicentre randomised controlled trials over the last decade using patient-centred outcomes have informed recent clinical practice guidelines. Several therapeutic options and combinations now exist to achieve optimal symptom control and pleurodesis, centred around patient choice and priorities, inpatient versus outpatient strategies and the presence of non-expandable lung. This review will explore the data that has shaped MPE management in the last decade, with the aim of providing a deeper understanding of the rationale behind current international guideline recommendations. It will also highlight areas where the evidence base is lacking, research currently in progress and potential future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.