Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950873›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025

Updates in the management of malignant pleural effusion: a clinical practice review.

Richard Westley, Duneesha De Fonseka, Eihab O Bedawi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard WestleyDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0776-2927
Duneesha De FonsekaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0060-9671
Eihab O BedawiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9196-3934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of a malignant pleural effusion (MPE) confers a poor prognosis, with a high burden of disabling symptoms due to altered respiratory mechanics and abnormal diaphragm function. Management is often palliative in nature, with the emphasis on preventing fluid re-accumulation. In the era of targeted therapies, pleural biopsies are often required for gene expression and receptor status profiling, for which local anaesthetic thoracoscopy provides the highest diagnostic yield. Interventions to achieve symptom control include thoracentesis, chest drain insertion, indwelling pleural catheters, medical thoracoscopy and surgery. The evidence base for these interventions has historically been lacking with a somewhat linear pathway, however, numerous well-designed, multicentre randomised controlled trials over the last decade using patient-centred outcomes have informed recent clinical practice guidelines. Several therapeutic options and combinations now exist to achieve optimal symptom control and pleurodesis, centred around patient choice and priorities, inpatient versus outpatient strategies and the presence of non-expandable lung. This review will explore the data that has shaped MPE management in the last decade, with the aim of providing a deeper understanding of the rationale behind current international guideline recommendations. It will also highlight areas where the evidence base is lacking, research currently in progress and potential future directions.

Indexed as

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE)pleural diseasepleurodesis

Identifiers

PMID40950873
PMCPMC12433027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.