ArticleJournal of technology in behavioral science2025
Differences in Self-Monitoring Technology Use and Perceptions Between National Weight Control Registry Participants Maintaining and Regaining Weight.
Article in Journal of technology in behavioral science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Self-monitoring technology (e.g., smartphone applications) aids weight loss, but its role in weight maintenance remains under studied. Purpose: To evaluate Methods: NWCR participants completed an online survey about self-monitoring technology use and perceptions. Of 1,000 invited participants, 794 completed the survey. Those who reported gaining ≥2.3kg (5lbs) in the past year were categorized as the "regain" group (40.8%); those reporting <2.3kg gain were the "maintain" group (59.2%). Results: The sample (n=794) was mostly female, White, middle-aged adults. "Regain" was more interested in technology than paper-based methods to self-monitor weight ( Conclusions: This appears to be the first study investigating naturalistic use of self-monitoring technology in a demographically homogenous sample maintaining significant weight loss. The "regain" group was more likely to use self-monitoring technology but reported more tracking-associated negative feelings. Future research must determine how to support individuals emotionally and with weight maintenance when self-monitoring contributes to negative byproducts. Other work should identify the optimal elements of self-monitoring technology for weight loss maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.