Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950752›Full record

ArticleJournal of technology in behavioral science2025

Differences in Self-Monitoring Technology Use and Perceptions Between National Weight Control Registry Participants Maintaining and Regaining Weight.

Carly M Goldstein, Stephanie P Goldstein, Benjamin T Ladd, Rena R Wing, John Graham Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of technology in behavioral science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carly M GoldsteinThe Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6150-5649
Stephanie P GoldsteinThe Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9656-1675
Benjamin T LaddThe Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-2862-8641
Rena R WingThe Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0918-8252
John Graham ThomasThe Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7549-2431

Funding

Project 3: Isolating food insecurity to understand childhood health outcomes and biological mechanisms of riskP20GM139767 · NIGMS · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI LAURA R STROUD · 2021 to 2026
$14.6M
Using Multimodal Real-Time Assessment to Phenotype Dietary Non-Adherence Behaviors that Contribute to Poor Outcomes in Behavioral Obesity TreatmentR01DK132210 · NIDDK · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI Stephanie Paige Goldstein · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
Optimizing Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention to Improve Dietary Adherence in Behavioral Obesity Treatment: A Micro-randomized TrialR01HL153543 · NHLBI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI GOLDSTEIN, STEPHANIE PAIGE · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
Optimization and Evaluation of a Tailored Behavioral eHealth/mHealth Weight Loss Intervention for Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients Using the Multiphase Optimization StrategyK23HL136845 · NHLBI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI GOLDSTEIN, CARLY MICHELLE · 2018 to 2022
$930k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL136845NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153543NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK132210NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM139767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Self-monitoring technology (e.g., smartphone applications) aids weight loss, but its role in weight maintenance remains under studied. Purpose: To evaluate Methods: NWCR participants completed an online survey about self-monitoring technology use and perceptions. Of 1,000 invited participants, 794 completed the survey. Those who reported gaining ≥2.3kg (5lbs) in the past year were categorized as the "regain" group (40.8%); those reporting <2.3kg gain were the "maintain" group (59.2%). Results: The sample (n=794) was mostly female, White, middle-aged adults. "Regain" was more interested in technology than paper-based methods to self-monitor weight ( Conclusions: This appears to be the first study investigating naturalistic use of self-monitoring technology in a demographically homogenous sample maintaining significant weight loss. The "regain" group was more likely to use self-monitoring technology but reported more tracking-associated negative feelings. Future research must determine how to support individuals emotionally and with weight maintenance when self-monitoring contributes to negative byproducts. Other work should identify the optimal elements of self-monitoring technology for weight loss maintenance.

Indexed as

obesitytechnologyweight lossweight trajectory

Identifiers

PMID40950752
PMCPMC12425467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.