Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950739›Full record

ArticleInternational review of social psychology2024

Towards an Interdisciplinary Consensual Measure of Social Participation: From Scoping Review to Clustering Measurement.

Jessica S Morton, Bernard Rimé, Ginette Herman, David Bourguignon, Olivier Luminet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International review of social psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica S MortonInstitut de recherche en sciences psychologiques, UCLouvain, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0077-0529
Bernard RiméInstitut de recherche en sciences psychologiques, UCLouvain, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8487-575X
Ginette HermanInstitut de recherche en sciences psychologiques, UCLouvain, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-4988
David BourguignonInstitut de recherche en sciences psychologiques, UCLouvain, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5428-422X
Olivier LuminetInstitut de recherche en sciences psychologiques, UCLouvain, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-2178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the current interest in social participation, this article focuses on existing measures that (1) include the four dimensions of formal social participation - breadth, intensity, duration, and engagement - identified by Bohnert et al. (2010) and (2) can be used in large-scale surveys. In Study 1, a scoping review conducted on three databases (PsychTest, PsychInfo, Sociological abstracts) identified 99 articles that included at least one measure of formal social participation. No measure met our two requirements. We therefore decided to design a new measure, which included an index based on six items to assess the four dimensions of the construct. Using clustering techniques, Study 2 identified social participation profiles based on the responses of 4,160 participants. Five clusters of social participation emerged: (0) absence, (1) passive, (2) low active, (3) medium active and (4) high active. Study 3 replicated these findings with a new sample (n = 3,956), thereby supporting the quality and replicability of the social participation measure by clustering. Coded as an ordinal categorical variable, the score lends itself to statistical analyses commonly performed on large-scale survey data. In this way, the Social Participation Index could meet the need for a standard tool that can be used in a multidisciplinary way.

Indexed as

clusterslarge-scale surveymeasurementscoping reviewsocial participation

Identifiers

PMID40950739
PMCPMC12372705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.