Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950736›Full record

ArticleInternational review of social psychology2024

Wrongness and Blame Judgments and Their Dynamics: Toward a Three-Input Processing Model of Moral Judgment.

Aurore Gaboriaud, Flora Gautheron, Jean-Charles Quinton, Annique Smeding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International review of social psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Feasible cognition requires latent state.Biological cybernetics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aurore GaboriaudUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, LIP/PC2S, F-38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0696-798X
Flora GautheronUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, LIP/PC2S, F-38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2714-8078
Jean-Charles QuintonUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, F-38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8118-1752
Annique SmedingUniv. Savoie Mont Blanc, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, LIP/PC2S, F-73000 Chambéry, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-9578

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In moral psychology, several approaches to moral judgments coexist, with sometimes contradictory results for different types of judgments. In the current research, we combine two views of moral judgment into a novel three-input processing model. As a first empirical test of this model, the present research investigates the influence of these three classic inputs (i.e., intent, outcome, and causality) on wrongness and blame judgments as well as their underlying dynamics. This preregistered experiment (

Indexed as

causalitydecision processintentmoral judgmentmouse-trackingoutcome

Identifiers

PMID40950736
PMCPMC12372680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.