ArticleJournal of analytical atomic spectrometry2025
Assessing the impact of common sample preparation strategies for single particle ICP-MS regarding recovery and size distribution of natural single particles.
Article in Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward Smart Salivary Diagnostics: A Comprehensive Review of Heavy Metal Biomarkers and Digital Risk Modeling.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Particles on the nano- and micro-scale are produced in a wide range of natural and anthropogenic processes and play a significant role in the biogeochemical cycling of major and trace elements in the environment. Single particle inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry (SP ICP-MS) is quickly becoming one of the premier techniques for analysis of nano- or micro-entities. However, SP ICP-MS analysis requires dilute aqueous solutions, free from large particles that could cause blockages. For environmentally relevant samples, like soil extracts, this typically calls for sample clean up. Sample preparation strategies like syringe filtration or ultra-centrifugation are regularly applied to handle complex matrices. The aim of this article is to examine the influence of common preparative strategies on the analysis of both naturally formed and synthetic nanoparticles in complex matrices. To achieve this, water extracts of mineral and sediment standards were spiked with Au nanoparticles and a variety of chemical and physical approaches were investigated to identify which strategies provide the best route to accurately quantifying particle numbers, masses and sizes. In a vast majority of cases, at least 90% of the detectable particles were lost for both particle types whenever filtration or centrifugation was applied. The addition of surfactants like Triton X-100 proved to promote relative particle recoveries of up to 30% for spiked Au particles but the extracted Fe-containing particles continued to have losses of up to 99%. Therefore, common sample preparation strategies are directly impeding the possibilities for quantitative particle analysis by SP ICP-MS. Furthermore, commonly used nanoparticles like Au do not necessarily reflect the reality of nano- and microparticles found in the environment. It is apparent that for SP ICP-MS to become a useful, quantitative method for environmental analysis there must be a high degree of care taken in the collection and preparation stages of analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.