ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Development and validation of a prognosis model for patients with brain-metastasis non-small cell lung cancer by machine-learning.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive modeling for survival-related outcomes in lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a mini-review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain metastasis, the most prevalent site of lung cancer metastasis, implies a grim prognosis. Adopting the best treatment approach is crucial for improving the survival of these patients. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a personalized prognostic model for brain-metastasized non-small cell lung cancer (BM-NSCLC) patients to aid in clinical decision-making. Methods: The study enrolled BM-NSCLC patients who were single-primary and had not undergone radical surgery from 2010 to 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method analysis was utilized to assess overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) under different treatments. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to ascertain independent prognostic factors. The dataset was partitioned into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts for the development and assessment of random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) models. The efficacy of the models was evaluated through the calculation of area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). A user-friendly web app was developed via shinyapps.io to increase the accessibility for clinicians. Results: A total of 3,171 eligible samples were ultimately included in the study. Survival analysis indicated that patients who underwent metastasis site surgery combined with radiotherapy based on chemotherapy exhibited a more favorable prognosis compared to alternative treatment modalities within the scope of this study. The RF model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for 1-year-OS, with an AUC of 0.89 in validation cohorts (n=951), and a more refined DCA profile. Conclusions: In the case of patients with BM-NSCLC, the integration of radiation therapy with surgery for metastasis site based on systematic treatment yielded the most significant benefits. The importance of a comprehensive treatment strategy that integrates chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy for these patients was emphasized. Additionally, a clinical decision-support tool constructed from this dataset, demonstrated robust discrimination, excellent calibration, and notable clinical utility. This tool will effectively assist clinical practitioners in making more personalized clinical decisions for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.