ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
A novel risk score model incorporating six co-stimulatory molecules for accurate prognosis prediction of laryngeal cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laryngeal cancer (LC) is a common respiratory tract malignancy. Although early-stage LC often responds well to treatment, advanced cases typically have poor outcomes and prognosis, resulting in a low overall survival (OS) rate. This study aimed to explore the correlation between co-stimulatory molecules and immune infiltration in LC and to construct a risk score (RS) model for predicting patient prognosis. Methods: The RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data of LC samples were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and used as the training dataset. The GSE27020 dataset served as the validation dataset. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify immune-related co-stimulatory molecules, based on which the samples were classified into three subtypes. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis was conducted to predict the survival prognosis in different subtypes. A prognostic RS model was constructed using the co-stimulatory molecules, which were obtained from the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm and validated using the GSE27020 dataset. Results: Eighteen immune-co-stimulatory molecules were identified, allowing classification of the samples into three subtypes, among which subtype 2 exhibited the most favorable prognosis. Eight immune cell types were found to be associated with the subtypes, and ten immune checkpoint genes showed differential expression across them. Six optimized co-stimulatory molecules were selected to construct the RS model, which was capable of predicting LC prognosis with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.870 for 1-year survival in the TCGA dataset. Validation using GSE27020 yielded an AUC of 0.736. Conclusions: An RS model incorporating six optimized co-stimulatory molecules was constructed and validated, demonstrating strong predictive power for the prognosis of patients with LC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.