Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950524›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025

Postoperative pain of impacted mandibular third molar surgery performed by general dental practitioners - a multicenter study.

Fernando J Mota de Almeida, Yvette Amba Kindlund, Robert Lundqvist, Angelika Lantto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fernando J Mota de AlmeidaPhD, Tandvårdens Kompetenscentrum, Norrbotten Public Dental Service, Region Norrbotten, Luleå, Sweden.
Yvette Amba KindlundDDS, Private practice, Luleå, Sweden.
Robert LundqvistTechn lic, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Sunderby Research Unit - Norrbotten, Umeå University, Sweden.
Angelika LanttoPhD, Tandvårdens Kompetenscentrum, Norrbotten Public Dental Service, Region Norrbotten, Luleå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Impacted third molars are common and often require surgical removal, which can lead to postoperative complications, particularly pain. While pain has been extensively studied in specialist settings, data from general dental practice remains limited. This study evaluated postoperative pain over seven days following mandibular third molar surgery performed by general dental practitioners (GDPs), who conduct a significant number of these procedures. Material and Methods: A prospective multi-center cohort study was conducted in three public dental clinics in Luleå, Sweden, from October 2022 to December 2023. Participants (≥18 years old) undergoing mandibular third molar surgery were included, while those requiring referral to an oral maxillofacial surgeon were excluded. Pain intensity was self-reported daily using a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0-10. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and t-tests. Results: Of 133 enrolled participants, 111 submitted valid pain assessments. Pain peaked on the day of surgery (Day 0), with 4% reporting the worst imaginable pain (NRS 10), 34% severe pain (NRS 7-9), and 35% moderate pain (NRS 4-6). Pain significantly declined by Day 1 ( Conclusions: Postoperative pain after third molar surgery performed by GDPs was highest on the day of surgery and declined rapidly.

Identifiers

PMID40950524
PMCPMC12424586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.