Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950514›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025

Debris Removal from Mandibular Molars Using Different Irrigation Volumes and Ultrasonic Tips: Micro-CT Study.

Alinne Patiery Pacífico Oliveira Feitosa, Arthur Costa Lemos, Suyane Maria Luna-Cruz, Ana Grasiela Limoeiro, Murilo Priori Alcalde, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, Marco Antônio Hungaro Duarte, Bruno Carvalho Vasconcelos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alinne Patiery Pacífico Oliveira FeitosaPost-graduate Program in Dentistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Arthur Costa LemosDepartment of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Suyane Maria Luna-CruzPost-graduate Program in Dentistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Ana Grasiela LimoeiroDepartment of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Murilo Priori AlcaldeDepartment of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Rodrigo Ricci VivanDepartment of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Marco Antônio Hungaro DuarteDepartment of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Bruno Carvalho VasconcelosPost-graduate Program in Dentistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study compared the impact of varying irrigating solution volumes and two ultrasonic tips on removing hard tissue debris (HTD) during passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in mesial roots of mandibular molars. Material and Methods: Sixty roots were instrumented using WaveOne Gold 35/.06 divided into 5 groups ( Results: Significant differences were observed in HTD removal between the IR30, IRP6, IRP30 groups, and the control group ( Conclusions: A larger volume of irrigating solution (30 mL compared to 6 mL) during the PUI protocol resulted in greater removal of HTD. Additionally, the Irrisonic Power tip did not significantly enhance HTD removal.

Identifiers

PMID40950514
PMCPMC12424600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.