ReviewDiscover public health2025
A scoping review of physical activity interventions to support the mental health of students aged 16 to 25.
Review in Discover public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reciprocal Within-Person Dynamics Between Internet Gaming Disorder Symptoms, Physical Activity, and Loneliness Among Chinese Adolescent Gamers: Three-Wave Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Personalized Insights Derived from Wearable Device Data and Large Language Models to Improve Well-Being.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A qualitative exploration of further education college staff perspectives on the challenges and opportunities for using physical activity to support student mental health in England.Discover public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The mental health of young people is a growing public health concern. While physical activity has both physical and mental health benefits, there is limited evidence on physical activity interventions to improve the mental health of young people aged 16 to 25. We aimed to scope the types and design of physical activity interventions in educational settings that target mental health outcomes for this group. Methods: A systematic search was conducted for articles published from 2015 to January 2025. References were screened and included for data extraction if they reported the effects of a physical activity-based intervention on mental health-related outcomes in students aged 16 to 25 in high income countries. Findings were reported according to PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. Results: A total of 22,437 records were identified and 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in the USA ( Conclusions: There was considerable heterogeneity in design of interventions, components used and how mental health was measured. There was a lack of evidence on inequalities in outcomes including differences by gender or socioeconomic position. The evidence examined in this review suggests physical activity-based interventions within education settings could be an effective and feasible option to support a range of mental health outcomes in students aged 16 to 25. However, several under-researched areas were identified, including a need for more well-designed, high-quality studies to examine the mental health effects of physical activity interventions within older adolescent students, and examining the differences between genders and sub-groups of young people such as those from lower SES backgrounds or with learning or physical disabilities. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-025-00933-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.