Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950463›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Cortical oscillations predict auditory grouping in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Nour Alsabbagh, Bob McMurray, Timothy D Griffiths, Joel I Berger, Kyogu Lee, Phillip E Gander, Inyong Choi

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nour AlsabbaghDept of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8794-2521
Bob McMurrayDept of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6532-284X
Timothy D GriffithsDept of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8066-4381
Joel I BergerDept of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1960-9487
Kyogu LeeDept of Intelligence and Information, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4210-0312
Phillip E GanderDept of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3945-8820
Inyong ChoiDept of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6663-9152

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Bruce Jay Gantz · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
The Development of Real Time Spoken and Written Word Recognition: Cognitive Bases of Language and Educational OutcomesR01DC008089 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MCMURRAY, BOB · 2007 to 2023
$7.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory grouping relies on the ability to bind tones with coherent spectral features over time to form auditory objects. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) degrades spectral resolution, and the extent of this degradation varies with the listening configuration. However, it remains unclear how SNHL impacts auditory grouping and whether different listening configurations affect this ability. This study investigated task performance and cortical activity during auditory object detection in four groups with different listening configurations: Twenty normal-hearing (NH) listeners, seventeen bilateral hearing aid users with acoustic-only stimulation (A-only), thirty-one cochlear implant (CI) users with acoustic and electric stimulation (A+E), and seventeen bilateral CI users with electric-only stimulation (E-only). While electroencephalography was recorded, participants performed a stochastic figure-ground task requiring the detection of spectrally and temporally coherent tone pips embedded in a background of random-frequency tone clouds. All groups achieved above 80% accuracy, though CI groups showed poorer performance compared to NH and A-only groups. Compared to NH listeners, the object-related evoked responses were weaker in A-only listeners and absent in CI groups. Delta (2-3.5Hz) and theta (4-7Hz) event-related synchronization (ERS) to the auditory objects were only observed in the NH group, except for the A+E group, which showed a delta ERS. However, all groups exhibited alpha (8-15Hz) and beta (17-30Hz) event-related desynchronization (ERD), with no significant group differences. Notably, individual differences in alpha and beta ERD predicted task accuracy. These findings suggest that alpha and beta cortical activity, measured during an auditory object detection task, reflects auditory grouping in any listening configuration.

Indexed as

Auditory groupingcochlear implantcortical evoked responsescortical oscillationshearing aidsensorineural hearing lossstochastic figure-ground

Identifiers

PMID40950463
PMCPMC12424927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.