ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Dairy Environments with Milk Exposure are Most Likely to Have Detection of Influenza A Virus.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of the H5N1 subtype has been infecting U.S dairy cattle and spreading among dairy farms since March 2024. H5N1 surveillance systems for dairy farms are needed, but information on whether environmental sampling can inform these systems is lacking. To guide a surveillance framework, we determined the environmental locations on H5N1-affected dairies (n = 25) in four states (California, Colorado, Michigan, and Ohio) that harbored influenza A virus (IAV), and explored sample characteristics that may influence viral detection. A total of 623 samples from environments and sale barns were characterized for IAV and classified into six categories based on location. A total of 94 samples (15.1%) had IAV detected, the majority in the following categories: milking equipment/personal protective equipment, parlor surfaces, and wastewater/lagoons/manure. These results suggest that dairy environments most likely to harbor IAV are those with exposure to milk, although the viral load in environmental samples was typically lower than that of bulk tank milk tested on a subset of farms. Mixed effect modeling was used to explore the relationship between IAV detection, Ct value, and days into an outbreak that samples were collected or the category where samples were collected. Days into an outbreak that samples were collected was associated with IAV detection while category of collection was associated with the measured Ct value. These results may guide H5N1 surveillance efforts on dairies, and can be strengthened by studies that collect samples from farm environmental locations prior to, during, and after H5N1 outbreak periods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.