Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950396›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Adolescent mental health before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Iceland: a repeated, cross-sectional, population-based study.

Erin Haskell, Berglind Sigmarsdottir, Ingibjorg Eva Thorisdottir, Audun Valborgarson, Elena Bonilla Aparicio, Olli Kiviruusu, Jaana Suvisaari, Zheng Chang, Eivind Ystrom, Agnieszka Butwicka and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Erin HaskellDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Berglind SigmarsdottirDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Ingibjorg Eva ThorisdottirPlanet Youth, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Audun ValborgarsonDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Elena Bonilla AparicioDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Olli KiviruusuDepartment of Public Health Solutions, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaana SuvisaariDepartment of Public Health Solutions, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Zheng ChangDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eivind YstromDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Agnieszka ButwickaDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bryndis Bjork AsgeirsdottirDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Heiddis Bjork ValdimarsdottirDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Inga Dora SigfusdottirDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
John Philip AllegranteDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Thorhildur HalldorsdottirDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adolescents' mental health declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet little is known about the long-term outcomes after the pandemic's declassification as a global health emergency (5 May 2023). This study examined changes in adolescent mental health in Iceland from 2016 to 2023, using a bioecological framework to identify risk and protective factors. Methods: Youth in Iceland surveys were administered nationwide to 13-15-year-olds in 2016, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, with an average 75% response rate across the years. The surveys included measures on depressive symptoms, anxiety and hostility (Symptom Checklist-90), parental social support (Perceived Parental Support Scale), screen time, and stress/trauma exposure (Negative Life Events Scale). Stepwise-reduced mixed-effects models assessed the association of age, gender, time and risk/protective factors and their effect on mental health. Multiple imputation addressed missing data, and Bonferroni corrections adjusted for multiple testing. Findings: 62,011 adolescents participated: 48.2% female (n = 29,890), 50.0% male (n = 31,002), 1.8% non-binary (n = 1119). Depressive symptoms showed signs of improvement post-pandemic (2023) compared to 2021 (β 0.19, 95% CI 0.13-0.24), yet remained higher than pre-pandemic levels (2016: β -0.38, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.33; 2018: β -0.26, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.20). Anxiety and hostility also increased and remained higher than pre-pandemic levels in 2023 (anxiety: 2016 β -0.29, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.24, 2018 β -0.20, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.15; hostility: 2016 β -0.26, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.20, 2018 β -0.12, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.07). Across all the models examining the predictors from diverse bioecological spheres, low parental social support, high social media use, and bad grades were consistently associated with poor mental health, regardless of mental health outcome and gender. Interpretation: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a serious and continuing negative effect on adolescents' mental health. Targeted interventions are needed to address the increase in mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on enhancing parental support and managing screen use. Funding: Icelandic Research Fund (217612-051); NordForsk (147386).

Indexed as

AdolescentsBioecological modelCOVID-19Gender differencesMental healthScreen use

Identifiers

PMID40950396
PMCPMC12432985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.