ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA assay for surveillance post-liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review Article: Biomarkers in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Towards Precision Medicine.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Post-Transplant Circulating Tumor DNA and Recurrence Risk After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
- Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: from patient selection and downstaging to risk stratification and post-transplant surveillance.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA for minimal residual disease and recurrence surveillance in hepatocellular carcinoma: current evidence and a translational roadmap.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liver transplantation (LT) for primary liver cancers achieves excellent patient outcomes, but a minority recur with poor prognosis. Survival may be improved by earlier recurrence detection. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and performance of a personalized tumor-informed assay utilizing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from peripheral blood for surveillance after LT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Methods: Here, we test whether a personalized tumor-informed assay utilizing ctDNA from peripheral blood informs post-LT surveillance. Personalized ctDNA assays were employed for surveillance in 38 LT recipients, alongside standard-of-care imaging and peripheral tumor biomarkers [alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9)]. Results: Recurrence was detected radiologically in 6 patients, with positive ctDNA assays in 3 and negative/insufficient to process (ITP) in 3. Nine ITP ctDNA assays were due to insufficient primary tumor tissue. In 31 patients without ITP ctDNA tests, the sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA were 75% [95% confidence interval (CI): 19-99%] and 100% (95% CI: 87-100%). Standard-of-care tumor biomarkers had sensitivity and specificity of 75% (95% CI: 19-99%) and 93% (95% CI: 76-99%), respectively (P>0.99 and P=0.16; McNemar χ Conclusions: This study corroborates the feasibility of ctDNA assays for recurrence surveillance in LT recipients. The results imply that ctDNA assays show promise in confirming recurrence and minimizing the need for invasive biopsy. However, additional prospective studies are needed to confirm ctDNA test utility in surveillance protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.