ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2025
Distinct roles of extracellular vesicles derived from various mesenchymal stem cell sources in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Extracellular Vesicles for Anti-Aging Therapy: Mechanisms, Applications, and Perspectives.Aging cell · 2026Review
- Lyophilized mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles for the oral treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a novel cell-free therapeutic strategy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Combined adipose- and umbilical cord-derived extracellular vesicles modulate inflammatory and chondrogenic signaling to promote cartilage repair.BioImpacts : BI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and underlying mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) in bone regeneration, with subgroup analyses based on EV source, dose, and delivery route.
methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (2015-2024) identified 2,414 records, of which 20 in vivo randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. Data on animal models, EV sources, dosing, administration methods, and outcomes - including bone volume/total volume, histology, biomechanics - were extracted. Meta-analyses and subgroup comparisons were conducted using random-effects models.
resultsMSC-EVs significantly promoted bone regeneration (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD]=2.17; 95% confidence interval: 2.08-2.25; P<0.00001). Local administration (n=15) and high-dose regimens (≥1×10
conclusionMSC-EVs significantly enhance bone regeneration in a source-dependent manner: BMSC-EVs demonstrate superior efficacy in critical-size defects; UCMSC-EVs are effective in inflammatory osteolysis; hiPS-MSC-EVs support multifunctional tissue repair. Optimizing dosing (≥1×10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.