ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Development of a machine learning-based predictive model for intraoperative hypothermia risk during radical surgery for oral cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk prediction models for inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting the risk of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing radical oral cancer surgery and to identify key contributing risk factors for clinical reference.
methodsThis retrospective study included 402 patients who underwent radical oral cancer resection, divided into training (n = 281) and validation (n = 121) cohorts. Demographic data, physiologic indicators, and intraoperative variables were collected. Predictive models were constructed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Random Forest (RF) algorithms. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis.
resultsThe RF model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.821 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.783-0.856) in the training cohort and 0.807 (95% CI: 0.742-0.865) in the validation cohort, with 64.6% sensitivity. It outperformed both the XGBoost model (validation AUC = 0.721) and LASSO model (validation AUC = 0.738). SHAP analysis identified surgical duration > 441 minutes (odds ratio [OR] = 2.31), baseline temperature ≤ 36.5°C (OR = 3.12), and intraoperative fluid volume ≥ 4.6 liters (OR = 1.89) as the most important predictors. Calibration curves showed strong agreement between predicted and actual outcomes (mean absolute error = 0.17).
conclusionThe ML-based RF model provides reliable prediction of intraoperative hypothermia risk in oral cancer surgery. Surgical duration and baseline temperature emerged as key risk factors, offering targets for perioperative risk stratification and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.