ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
A comparative study of the efficacy of an ultra-picosecond laser versus an ultra-pulsed CO
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of the ultra-pulsed carbon dioxide (CO
methodsThis retrospective study included 230 XP patients treated from February 2021 to June 2024. Among them, 120 patients received ultra-pulsed CO
resultsBoth lasers achieved high clearance rates (> 95%), with no significant difference between the two groups (83.33% in the ultra-pulsed CO
conclusionsBoth laser therapies were effective in treating XP. However, the ultra-picosecond laser demonstrated superior safety, with fewer complications and lower recurrence rates, despite requiring more treatment sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.