Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950171›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Collateral mutagenesis funnels multiple sources of DNA damage into a ubiquitous mutational signature.

Natanael Spisak, Marc de Manuel, Molly Przeworski

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natanael SpisakDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6332-047X
Marc de ManuelInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, Barcelona.ORCID 0000-0002-1245-0127
Molly PrzeworskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5369-9009

Funding

Recombination rate variation and evolution in vertebratesR01GM083098 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PRZEWORSKI, MOLLY F · 2007 to 2024
$4.6M
Mechanisms of mutation and recombination and their evolution in vertebratesR35GM153355 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI MOLLY F PRZEWORSKI · 2024 to 2026
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083098NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM153355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations reflect the net effects of myriad types of damage, replication errors, and repair mechanisms, and thus are expected to differ across cell types with distinct exposures to mutagens, division rates, and cellular programs. Yet when mutations in humans are decomposed into a set of "signatures", one single base substitution signature, SBS5, is present across cell types and tissues, and predominates in post-mitotic neurons as well as male and female germlines [1-3]. The etiology of SBS5 is unknown. By modeling the processes by which mutations arise, we infer that SBS5 is the footprint of errors in DNA synthesis triggered by distinct types of DNA damage. Supporting this hypothesis, we find that SBS5 rates increase with signatures of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage in cancerous and non-cancerous cells and co-vary with repair rates along the genome as expected from model predictions. These analyses indicate that SBS5 captures the output of a "funnel", through which multiple sources of damage result in a similar mutation spectrum. As we further show, SBS5 mutations arise not only from translesion synthesis but also from DNA repair, suggesting that the signature reflects the occasional, shared use of a polymerase.

Identifiers

PMID40950171
PMCPMC12424658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.