Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40950102›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Time-adaptive modulation of evidence evaluation in rat posterior parietal cortex.

Preetham Ganupuru, Adam B Goldring, Tanner Stevenson, Kendall Stewart, Rishidev Chaudhuri, Timothy D Hanks

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Preetham GanupuruCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis.
Adam B GoldringCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis.
Tanner StevensonCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis.
Kendall StewartCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis.
Rishidev ChaudhuriCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis.ORCID 0000-0003-2301-3261
Timothy D HanksCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis.ORCID 0000-0003-4147-4475

Funding

Training Program in Basic NeuroscienceT32MH082174 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI W MARTIN USREY · 2007 to 2026
$3.1M
Learning, Memory, and Plasticity (LaMP) Training ProgramT32MH112507 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Karen Zito · 2017 to 2026
$2.4M
Corticostriatal contributions to evidence evaluation and decision selectionR01MH124818 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HANKS, TIMOTHY D. · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
Unraveling the causal role of posterior parietal cortex in perceptual decision makingR21MH114147 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HANKS, TIMOTHY D. · 2018 to 2019
$432k
Neural circuits underlying flexible control of evidence evaluation timescales in decision makingR56MH120283 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HANKS, TIMOTHY D. · 2020 to 2020
$393k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124818NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH114147NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH120283NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082174NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH112507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial component of successful decision making is determining the optimal timescale over which to evaluate evidence. For example, when detecting transient changes in the environment, it is best to focus evaluation on the current evidence as opposed to older evidence. However, it is unclear how this adjustment in timescale is achieved in the brain in terms of how the neurons that process evidence adjust their dynamics. To address this question, we used Neuropixel probes to record spiking activity from neurons in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) of rats performing a free-response auditory change detection task in which subjects evaluate sensory evidence over short timescales to determine when a change occurs in a noisy sensory stream. Consistent with longer timescale temporal integration tasks, we found that PPC neurons modulated their activity by the strength of evidence leading to decisions, were selective for the rats' choices, and had opposing populations of neurons that were positively versus negatively modulated by evidence. However, in contrast to temporal integration tasks, responses of neurons to individual pulses of evidence were transient, such that the effect of the evidence on activity tapered off over a timescale corresponding to the subject's behavioral timescale of evidence evaluation. Intriguingly, PPC also exhibited "gain changes" in the influence of evidence as a function of decision time that were consistent with changes in behavioral urgency. In addition, reversible inactivation revealed an important role for PPC in this auditory change detection, such that PPC inactivation altered choice behavior and the timescale over which rats evaluated evidence. Together, our results suggest important contributions of PPC to free-response decisions that involve adjusting timescales of evidence evaluation.

Identifiers

PMID40950102
PMCPMC12424683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.