ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
User-friendly scheduler Using a hybrid architecture and supercomputing for big data processing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The exponential growth of omics data requires novel strategies for storage, transfer, and processing of said data. We present a scheduler based on the Temporal.io workflow framework which enables two key optimizations of bioinformatics workflows. Firstly, we enable users to transparently map workflow steps to diverse execution environments, including high-performance computing (HPC) resources managed by the SLURM resource manager through an easy-to-use graphical user interface. Secondly, we enable asynchronous execution of workflows, a feature which guarantees that workflows will achieve reasonable resource utilization even when the scheduler cannot make use of a system's full RAM and CPU resources. Thirdly, we propose a universal, platform agnostic JSON representation of workflows that allows platform-specific execution details to be abstracted away from the core scientific logic. Our work includes a custom executor plugin that supports translation of workflows from an external language, such as Nextflow, to our universal JSON format. Finally, we develop a graphical user interface to make our scheduler easy-to-use for non-technical users. When benchmarked on a bulk RNA sequencing workflow, these features reduced the cost and time requirements. We illustrated the merits of our cross-platform method using credit allocations from federally funded supercomputers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.