ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Blended Length Genome Sequencing (blend-seq): Combining Short Reads with Low-Coverage Long Reads to Maximize Variant Discovery.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel and accelerated method for integrated alignment and variant calling from short and long reads.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We introduce blend-seq, a workflow for combining data from traditional short-read sequencing pipelines with low-coverage long reads, to improve variant discovery for single samples without the full cost of high-coverage long reads. We demonstrate that with only 4x long-read coverage augmenting 30x short reads, we can improve SNP discovery across the genome, exceeding performance beyond even high-coverage short reads (60x). For genotype-agnostic discovery of structural variants, we see a threefold improvement in recall while maintaining precision by using the low-coverage long reads on their own, and show how we can improve genotyping accuracy by adding in the short-read data. In addition, we demonstrate how the long reads can better phase these variants, incorporating long-context information in the genome to substantially outperform phasing with short reads alone. Our experiments highlight the complementary nature of short- and long-read technologies: the former contributing higher depth for genotyping and the latter better resolution of larger events or those in difficult regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.