ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Evolutionary Tree in Chemical Space of Natural Products.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural products (NPs) are key to biological function and adaptation, with their distribution shaped by complex evolutionary and ecological forces. While it may seem reasonable to assume that closely related species produce chemically similar NPs, this assumption has not been systematically tested at a broad taxonomic scale. Here, we evaluate whether evolutionary (taxonomic) proximity correlates with chemical similarity in large-scale data from the Lotus database of NPs. We use five deep learning-based encoders, including Chemformer and SMILES Transformer, to embed NPs into a high-dimensional "chemical space." Our results demonstrate that, for flowering plants (Magnoliopsida) and conifers (Pinopsida), species separated by shorter taxonomic distances tend to produce significantly more similar NPs. Similar trends are observed for Fungi and Metazoa, albeit with some complications, possibly due to horizontal gene transfer, convergent evolution, and/or incomplete coverage in the dataset used for NPs. Our findings suggest that the evolutionary tree can be statistically recovered in a chemical space of NPs, provided that this space is constructed with appropriate deep learning techniques, and provide a new computational framework to investigate the evolutionary dynamics of secondary metabolism. These results can inform drug design strategies, for example by enabling the reconstruction of NPs from poorly studied or extinct species.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.