ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Mice navigate scent trails using predictive policies.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals actively sense their environment to extract features of interest to guide behaviors. For mammals, odors are prominent environmental features which are sampled by active modulation of sniffing and orofacial orientation. We sought to understand the strategies that mice use to navigate surface-bound odor cues. We presented mice with dynamic, non-repeating odor trails using a paper treadmill, and observed their behaviors as they collected rewards offered randomly along the trail. By combining high-speed videography over long distances with quantitative behavioral analyses, we find that mice rapidly learn to track odor trails persistently and precisely. Mice with a single nostril blocked can track odor trails, but with a lateral bias and lower precision than control animals. Tracking is severely impaired in animals with both nostrils intact but with interhemispheric communication disrupted by anterior commissure transection. Respiration measurements revealed that a sniff close to the trail triggers a rapid turn towards the trail, a reaction that is lost in commissure-cut animals. Importantly, trail tracking is not simply reactive but involves adaptation to and retention of a short-term memory of the trail geometry and statistics. Our results, recapitulated by a Bayesian inference model, indicate that mice combine immediate sensory information with an internal model of the odor environment to follow odor trails efficiently.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.