ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling of Concurrent and Prospective Substance Use in Adolescence.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the neural mechanisms of adolescent substance use is a critical public health issue, with direct implications for bolstering prevention and treatment strategies. Yet this effort is challenging because substance use is multi-faceted, commonly used brain network features are not optimized to capture both local and global aspects of intrinsic connectivity, and because the facets themselves sensitive to developmental shifts. In this study, we operationalized adolescent substance use along three dimensions-intent, access, and family-developmental history-and trained predictive models of each facet using resting-state connectivity. Trait impulsivity, a known risk factor, was also examined. Using Baseline and 2 Year Follow-Up data from the ABCD Bids Community Collection (ABCC), we found that prediction was more successful at follow-up than baseline. At baseline, predictive accuracy was modest and intent to use substances was the most accurately predicted facet. Prediction accuracies at follow-up were much higher, with access and family-developmental history being better predicted, signaling a developmental shift in the brain-behavior mapping of substance use vulnerabilities. These findings suggest that the neurobiological correlates of substance are dynamic across adolescence, possibly reflecting changing phenotype. More broadly, these results underscore the importance of modeling distinct substance use facets and accounting for developmental timing to understand risk trajectories, while contributing to a growing literature that shows early-developing individual differences are predictive of later outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.