ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic telesurgery in pediatric surgery: a case series.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic and Robotic Appendectomy: Efficiency and Cost Comparison.Journal of surgery and research · 2026Article
- Tele-Robotic Pectopexy Across Cities Using an Indigenous Robotic Platform: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- A tiny patient, a giant leap: The world's first robotic telesurgery for congenital pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in a 16-month-old infant.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite an escalating number of robot models that have facilitated remote surgery since 2008, the utilization of robotic remote surgery in pediatric surgery remains unreported. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of applying the single-port robotic system (SHURUI SR-ENS-600) in pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic remote surgery. Case Description: Between October 2024 and February 2025, an experienced surgeon situated at tertiary medical centers in Guangzhou and Liuzhou employed the SHURUI Endoscopic Surgical Robotic System to perform remote robot-assisted laparoscopic appendectomy (RA) and robot-assisted laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision (RC) in four pediatric patients. Patients meeting the enrollment criteria underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic telesurgery (RLT) using SHURUI system. Trained assistants were positioned on the patients' side to avoid possible complications. Two cases of RA and two of RC were conducted, involving one male and three females, with a median age of 7 years (range, 4-11 years). All procedures were completed using telesurgery alone, and no conversions were recorded. The surgeon and the patient were separated by a distance of 512 km, with a mean round-trip latency of 28.50 ms (range, 25-33 ms). The median total operative time was 266 min (range, 90-481 min), and the median remote control duration was 171 min (range, 55-308 min). There were no complications nor mortalities observed in the perioperative period. All patients were routinely followed up without loss and the median follow-up time was 3.5 months (range, 2-6 months). Conclusions: The results suggest that RLT is practicable and secure under the supervision of an experienced surgery team. Further research with larger sample sizes is necessary to explore the application of RLT in pediatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.