ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Identification and validation of a histone modification-related gene signature to predict the prognosis of multiple myeloma.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deciphering epigenetic crosstalk in multiple myeloma pathogenesis and treatment.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy with high heterogeneity. Current staging systems, including the International Staging System (ISS) and Revised ISS (R-ISS), have limited prognostic accuracy. Given the role of histone modifications in MM progression, we developed a histone modification-related (HMR) prognostic model to improve MM risk stratification. Methods: Gene expression and mutation data were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database and the Cancer Genome Atlas. Prognostic HMR-related genes were identified through a combination of univariate Cox regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression, and random survival forest analysis. The genes identified were then used to construct the HMR risk score model using multivariate Cox regression. The model was validated using Kaplan-Meier survival, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves analysis. A nomogram combining the HMR score with clinical features was developed. Functional enrichment, immune infiltration, somatic mutation, and drug sensitivity analysis were conducted to explore the biological relevance of the model. Results: Seven HMR genes with prognostic significance were identified. The HMR risk score stratified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups, with significant survival differences. The model demonstrated favorable predictive performance, and was shown to be an independent prognostic factor. The nomogram showed good calibration and discriminative ability, offering a practical tool for individual patient risk assessment. Functional analysis revealed that the HMR risk score is associated with dysregulated cell cycle progression, proliferation, and immunosuppression in MM, which may contribute to disease progression and drug resistance. Moreover, drug sensitivity analysis indicated potential associations between the HMR score and response to specific therapeutic agents, highlighting its potential role in guiding personalized treatment. Conclusion: We developed an HMR gene signature that has potential for prognostic prediction and may help guide personalized treatment strategies in MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.