ArticleRSC advances2025
In-flow single particle detection of sub-100 micron microplastics.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pervasive and growing contamination of ecosystems by microplastics (MPs) has emerged as a critical environmental and societal challenge. These synthetic polymer fragments, typically defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm, are now recognized not only for their persistence in natural environments but also for their potential to carry adsorbed pollutants and to be ingested by a wide range of organisms, including humans. Of particular concern are MPs in the sub-100 μm range, which are more difficult to isolate and analyze but may exhibit enhanced mobility, reactivity, and bioavailability. The accurate detection, quantification, and chemical characterization of such small MPs are therefore essential for advancing our understanding of their sources, fate, and impacts. However, current analytical approaches-primarily based on filtration, staining, and spectroscopic methods-remain time-consuming and often lack the sensitivity or selectivity required for sub-100 μm particles in complex aqueous matrices. In this study, we present a novel microfluidic strategy for the rapid, in-flow detection and molecular identification of individual MPs in suspension. The method integrates dielectrophoresis (DEP) for the label-free spatial manipulation of particles and Raman microspectroscopy (RM) for their chemical fingerprinting. A custom-fabricated glass microfluidic chip was developed, incorporating electrodes on both the top and bottom surfaces of the main channel to achieve three-dimensional DEP focusing. MPs ranging from 25 to 50 μm in diameter were successfully aligned along the channel's central axis and interrogated in real time using RM. This approach enabled unambiguous, particle-by-particle identification of five widely encountered polymer types: polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), both in monodisperse and polydisperse mixtures. Our results demonstrate that DEP/RM coupling offers a powerful and scalable platform for in-flow MPs analysis, combining high spatial resolution and chemical specificity. This proof of concept opens new possibilities for high-throughput and automated detection of MPs in environmental monitoring and water analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.