ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025
The value of intestinal ultrasound scores in predicting long-term endoscopic outcomes in ulcerative colitis.
Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The value of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in predicting treatment outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC) remains underexplored. Objectives: To compare the predictive accuracy of representative IUS scores for long-term endoscopic outcomes in UC. Design: A retrospective observational study. Methods: Consecutive UC patients initiating biologics/small-molecule drugs were enrolled. IUS examinations were performed at baseline, 4-6 months, and at the first colonoscopy reassessment (12-30 months). IUS images were reviewed, and bowel wall thickness (BWT), Milan ultrasound criteria (MUC), and International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) were recorded. Endoscopic response was assessed using the Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES), with remission defined as MES = 0 and improvement as MES ⩽1. Results: Forty-nine patients were included. All three IUS scores showed significant correlations with concurrent MES, with IBUS-SAS demonstrating the strongest association (BWT, ρ = 0.54; MUC, ρ = 0.55; IBUS-SAS, ρ = 0.69). IBUS-SAS at 4-6 months was the most accurate predictor of long-term endoscopic remission (area under the curve (AUC) 0.767) and endoscopic improvement (AUC 0.770). On multivariable analysis, an IBUS-SAS score <25.5 at 4-6 months was the only independent predictor of endoscopic remission (odds ratio (OR) 7.6, Conclusion: The IBUS-SAS score at early follow-up may serve as a valuable predictor of long-term endoscopic outcomes in UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.