ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025
Tofacitinib in acute severe ulcerative colitis: review addressing seven key unmet needs.
Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, shows promise as a rescue therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), a life-threatening condition marked by high colectomy rates. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and systematic reviews. The efficacy of tofacitinib has been documented, with an 83.01% day-7 response rate in the TACOS trial and 79.9%-86% 90-day colectomy-free survival in steroid-refractory ASUC. However, seven unmet needs impede the adoption of tofacitinib treatment for managing ASUC: (1) a lack of head-to-head RCTs comparing tofacitinib not only to standard rescue therapies like infliximab and ciclosporin but also to other JAK inhibitors like upadacitinib, (2) uncertainty in optimal dosing and duration, (3) ambiguity in positioning tofacitinib in the treatment algorithm, (4) undefined patient selection criteria, notably for those with prior biologic exposure, (5) limited long-term efficacy and cost-utilization data, (6) unresolved safety risks (e.g., infections, thrombosis), and (7) underexplored potential for combination therapy. These gaps undermine the widespread use of tofacitinib in reducing surgical burden and improving outcomes. Collaborative research-especially multi-center RCTs comparing tofacitinib to infliximab, ciclosporin, and next-generation JAK inhibitors-is vital for establishing evidence-based protocols. Addressing these needs could optimize tofacitinib-based ASUC management, offering a rapid, oral alternative to enhance patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.