Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949803›Full record

ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2025

Converting USMLE Step 1 to Pass or Fail: The Potential Impact on Applicants Who Are Female or From Underrepresented Groups.

Haris Ahmed, Peter Yu, Brendan Rosamond, Jonathan Lall, Scott Zimmerle, Said Maldonado, Nicole Lyons, Ashlynn N Mills, Yoolim Alex Seo, Angelica C Rodriquez and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Recent trends in integrated cardiothoracic residency match.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Haris AhmedHCA Florida Orange Park Hospital, Orange Park, Florida.
Peter YuHCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, Kingwood, Texas.
Brendan RosamondUniversity of Houston, Tilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Jonathan LallUniversity of Houston, Tilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Scott ZimmerleUniversity of Houston, Tilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Said MaldonadoUniversity of Houston, Tilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Nicole LyonsUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Ashlynn N MillsUniversity of Houston, Tilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Yoolim Alex SeoUniversity of Houston, Tilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Angelica C RodriquezUniversity of Houston, Tilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Jacqueline E LevesqueUniversity of Houston, Tilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Oluwatunmininu A AnwojuHCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, Kingwood, Texas.
Zuhair AliHCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, Kingwood, Texas.
Rajeev RaghavanHCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, Kingwood, Texas.
Mike LiangHCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, Kingwood, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In January 2022, the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 exam became pass/fail and the transition to using USMLE Step 2 scores for residency interview screening appeared imminent. While this change was intended to result in holistic reviews of residency applicants, the impact remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine how USMLE scoring changes might affect female candidates and applicants from underrepresented groups (URM). Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of all applicants to a single institution. Data for applicants were extracted from their 2021-2022 residency applications and included age, race, sex, medical school, region, USMLE Step 1 score, and USMLE Step 2 scores. All applicants who graduated from a US medical school with both USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores were eligible for inclusion. Our primary outcome was the difference between USMLE Step 1 versus Step 2 scores. Two comparisons were made; female candidates were compared to male candidates and URM compared to non-URM. Results: On regression analysis, we noted that female candidates (coefficient = 4.007; 95% CI, 2.64-5.37, Conclusion: Making USMLE Step 1 pass/fail may benefit female candidates during the interview process, while adversely impacting URM. As the application process evolves, the impacts on female and URM need to be carefully evaluated to achieve equitable representation in residency programs.

Indexed as

diversitygender equitymedical educationunderrepresented minoritiesUSMLE scores

Identifiers

PMID40949803
PMCPMC12425408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.