ArticleBlood neoplasia2025
Retrospective evaluation of R-EPOCH in the frontline treatment of adult patients with PTLD after solid organ transplant.
Article in Blood neoplasia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Posttransplant rituximab exposure and risk of PTLD in solid organ transplant recipients with EBV DNAemia.Blood neoplasia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are rare complications of solid organ transplantation, which carry significant morbidity and mortality. Phase 2 trials that use sequential rituximab (R) followed by R, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) have become an acceptable approach for B-cell PTLD, although it carries a high risk of treatment-related mortality (up to 11%). Many aspects of B-cell PTLD biology and patient characteristics parallel AIDS-related lymphomas in which dose-modified R, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (DM-R-EPOCH) has been demonstrated to be highly efficacious and safe. In this single-institution retrospective study of (N = 101) adult transplant recipients with B-cell PTLD, 65 received DM-R-EPOCH, 8 received R-CHOP, and 17 received R monotherapy. Median progression-free and overall survival was 4.4 years and 6.4 years, respectively, for DM-R-EPOCH and 1 year and 1.1 years, respectively, for R-CHOP. Rates of neutropenia and infection were 70% and 77%, respectively, for DM-R-EPOCH, and 88% each for R-CHOP. Treatment-related mortality for patients treated with DM-R-EPOCH and R-CHOP was 4.7% and 25%, respectively. The median number of cycles of DM-R-EPOCH was 6, and between 73% and 89% of patients received a relative dose intensity of ≥80% for cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and doxorubicin. The relative dose intensity of vincristine was <80% in 56% of patients because of frequent omission for gastrointestinal involvement of PTLD. Collectively, these data suggest that DM-R-EPOCH does not lead to excessive toxicity in patients with B-cell PTLD and support the need for further prospective clinical studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.