Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949760›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Randomness with constraints: constructing minimal models for high-dimensional biology.

Ilya Nemenman, Pankaj Mehta

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ilya NemenmanDepartment of Physics, Department of Biology, Initiative in Theory and Modeling of Living Systems, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Pankaj MehtaDepartment of Physics and Faculty of Computing and Data Science, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

Funding

MODELING EMERGENT BEHAVIORS IN SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: A BIOLOGICAL PHYSICS APPROACHR35GM119461 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Pankaj Mehta · 2016 to 2026
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologists and physicists have a rich tradition of modeling living systems with simple models composed of a few interacting components. Despite the remarkable success of this approach, it remains unclear how to use such finely tuned models to study complex biological systems composed of numerous heterogeneous, interacting components. One possible strategy for taming this biological complexity is to embrace the idea that many biological behaviors we observe are "typical" and can be modeled using random systems that respect biologically-motivated constraints. Here, we review recent works showing how this approach can be used to make close connection with experiments in biological systems ranging from neuroscience to ecology and evolution and beyond. Collectively, these works suggest that the "random-with-constraints" paradigm represents a promising new modeling strategy for capturing experimentally observed dynamical and statistical features in high-dimensional biological data and provides a powerful minimal modeling philosophy for biology.

Identifiers

PMID40949760
PMCPMC12425012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.