ArticleJournal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques2025
Adverse drug events associated with tiotropium: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- From policy to practice: Evaluating the global implications of the FDA's PDURS framework.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tiotropium, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, is commonly employed for the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. While its efficacy has been validated through numerous randomized controlled trials, safety concerns in real-world post-marketing settings necessitate further evaluation. Aim: This study aimed to analyze the adverse events (AEs) associated with tiotropium reported in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to identify potential safety signals. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on adverse reaction reports related to tiotropium in the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2024. The AE names in the FAERS database were systematically classified using the Preferred Terms (PTs) and System Organ Classes (SOCs) provided by the latest version of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA 27.1). After deduplication, a combination of methods, including the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), was employed for disproportionality analysis. Results: A total of 129,763 AE reports related to tiotropium were included in the analysis, affecting 65,045 patients. These reports encompassed 27 different SOC categories, identifying 264 AEs associated with tiotropium. After excluding certain AEs deemed clinically insignificant, the most common AEs reported were dyspnea (n = 8,600), cough (n = 2,440), and pneumonia (n = 2080). The AEs exhibiting the highest signal strength included aggravated dyspnea (ROR: 162.04), hoarseness (ROR: 43.42), and aggravated chronic obstructive airway disease (ROR: 43.17). Additionally, we identified potential risks not mentioned in the instructions (United States Prescribing Information and the Canadian Product Monograph), such as epiglottic cancer, halo vision, and malignant lung tumors. Conclusion: This study offers a more comprehensive understanding of tiotropium by uncovering previously unreported adverse reactions. Physicians should take these newly identified adverse reactions into account when prescribing this medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.