Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949724›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques2025

Adverse drug events associated with tiotropium: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system database.

Yang Rui, Tianyuan Xin, Yu Chen, Beiyi Xiang, Changwen Chen, Lin Zhang, Zhe Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yang RuiLaboratory of Cough, Kunshan Key Laboratory of Chronic Cough, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Suzhou, China.
Tianyuan XinLaboratory of Cough, Kunshan Key Laboratory of Chronic Cough, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Suzhou, China.
Yu ChenLaboratory of Cough, Kunshan Key Laboratory of Chronic Cough, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Suzhou, China.
Beiyi XiangLaboratory of Cough, Kunshan Key Laboratory of Chronic Cough, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Suzhou, China.
Changwen ChenLaboratory of Cough, Kunshan Key Laboratory of Chronic Cough, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Suzhou, China.
Lin ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Changshu No.1 People's Hospital, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zhe ChenLaboratory of Cough, Kunshan Key Laboratory of Chronic Cough, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tiotropium, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, is commonly employed for the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. While its efficacy has been validated through numerous randomized controlled trials, safety concerns in real-world post-marketing settings necessitate further evaluation. Aim: This study aimed to analyze the adverse events (AEs) associated with tiotropium reported in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to identify potential safety signals. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on adverse reaction reports related to tiotropium in the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2024. The AE names in the FAERS database were systematically classified using the Preferred Terms (PTs) and System Organ Classes (SOCs) provided by the latest version of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA 27.1). After deduplication, a combination of methods, including the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), was employed for disproportionality analysis. Results: A total of 129,763 AE reports related to tiotropium were included in the analysis, affecting 65,045 patients. These reports encompassed 27 different SOC categories, identifying 264 AEs associated with tiotropium. After excluding certain AEs deemed clinically insignificant, the most common AEs reported were dyspnea (n = 8,600), cough (n = 2,440), and pneumonia (n = 2080). The AEs exhibiting the highest signal strength included aggravated dyspnea (ROR: 162.04), hoarseness (ROR: 43.42), and aggravated chronic obstructive airway disease (ROR: 43.17). Additionally, we identified potential risks not mentioned in the instructions (United States Prescribing Information and the Canadian Product Monograph), such as epiglottic cancer, halo vision, and malignant lung tumors. Conclusion: This study offers a more comprehensive understanding of tiotropium by uncovering previously unreported adverse reactions. Physicians should take these newly identified adverse reactions into account when prescribing this medication.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsBronchodilator AgentsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceTiotropium BromideAdultAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBronchodilator AgentsTiotropium Bromideadverse drug eventsdata miningdisproportionality analysispharmacovigilancetiotropium

Identifiers

PMID40949724
PMCPMC12425831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.