SynthesisFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Global trends and research gaps in deep brain stimulation for neurodevelopmental disorders: a scientometrics exploration of functional and behavioral outcomes.
Synthesis in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Profile and outcomes of Parkinson's disease deep brain stimulation in a public tertiary center in Brazil: retrospective cohort.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Observational
- A bibliometric analysis of neurosurgical articles published in the Persian language (2000-2025).Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deep brain stimulation has emerged as a potential intervention for improving functional outcomes and behavioral regulation in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. However, the extent to which these clinical endpoints have been systematically studied remains unclear. Methods: A comparative scientometrics analysis was conducted to map the research landscape on deep brain stimulation in neurodevelopmental disorders ( Results: We found a sustained increase in publication volume since 1996, but only 6.2% of studies explicitly addressed functional or behavioral endpoints. Clinical trials and systematic reviews were underrepresented in both datasets (1.20 and 3.12% in the general analysis; 0 and 7.69% in the subset, respectively). High-income countries dominated scientific production, with minimal contributions from lower-income regions. In the focused subset, Colombia emerged among the top 3 most productive countries. Keyword analyses revealed a thematic concentration on diagnostic categories rather than outcome-based evidence. Discussion: These findings highlight critical research gaps and suggest a misalignment between current scientific focus and the clinical potential of deep brain stimulation in neurodevelopmental disorders. Future studies should focus on functional improvement and behavioral modulation to bridge this divide and support the development of evidence-based, patient-centered applications of deep brain stimulation in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.