ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2025
Impaired face identity discrimination in individuals with cerebral visual impairment: a pilot study.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Visual perception in children and adolescents with visual impairments.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is the leading cause of pediatric visual impairment and results from brain-related injury or maldevelopment. Higher-order visual processing deficits are commonly reported and can include difficulties recognizing faces, which can adversely affect the development of communication and socialization skills. In this study, we aimed to measure face discrimination ability in CVI compared to controls using a rapid, self-administered, remote paradigm. Methods: We quantified face discrimination ability with a Foraging Interactive D-prime (FInD) paradigm that measured the threshold distance between Basel Model Faces required for participants to report whether faces were of the same or different people. We measured face discrimination thresholds in 8 control and 8 CVI participants viewing forward-facing and tilted faces. Results: Face discrimination thresholds were significantly higher for CVI than control participants [t(13)=-3.439, P=0.004]. Contrary to controls, CVI participants showed no significant difference between forward-facing and tilted faces [t Conclusions: These findings quantify a face processing deficit in individuals with CVI and show that this impairment is independent of visual acuity. We hypothesize that while control participants can exploit point-wise comparisons between identical images, individuals with CVI possibly do not utilize this additional source of information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.