ArticleDigital health
Federated learning and differential privacy: Machine learning and deep learning for biomedical image data classification.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanostructured electrode materials and flexible-substrate engineering for wearable multi-analyte biosensors in diabetes monitoring and personalized care: a comprehensive review.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Privacy-preserving federated learning with optimized ensemble weighting and knowledge distillation for COVID-19 detection from non-IID medical imaging data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fusion of genomic and pathological data for breast cancer detection using BCDNN.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Towards precision medicine in Tourette syndrome: a perspective on AI-driven predictive modelling and personalised care.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of differential privacy and federated learning in healthcare is key for maintaining patient confidentiality while ensuring accurate predictive modeling. With increasing concerns about privacy, it is essential to explore methods that protect data privacy without compromising model performance. Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of feedforward neural networks (FNNs), Gaussian processes (GPs), and a subset of deep learning neural networks (MLP) in classifying biomedical image data, incorporating federated learning to enhance privacy preservation. Method: We implemented FNN, GP, and MLP models using federated learning and differential privacy techniques. Models were evaluated based on training and validation accuracy, correlation coefficients, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and relative errors, including relative absolute error (RAE) and relative root squared error (RRSE). Results: The FNN achieved 86.49% training accuracy and 82.08% overall accuracy but showed potential overfitting with 68.75% validation accuracy. The GP model had a correlation coefficient of 0.9741, a MAE of 108.38, and a RMSE of 173.49. The DNN outperformed the other models with a correlation coefficient of 0.9980, a MAE of 36.80, and a RMSE of 51.01. Federated learning improved privacy while maintaining model performance. Conclusion: Federated learning with differential privacy offers a promising solution for secure and accurate biomedical image classification, supporting privacy-preserving machine learning in medical diagnostics without compromising performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.