Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40949670›Full record

ArticleDigital health

The top 100 most-cited articles on large language models in medicine: A bibliometric analysis.

Zhi-Qiang Li, Runbing Xu, Xin-Ran Gong, Cheng-Lu Wang, Jian-Ping Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhi-Qiang LiCentre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1492-4995
Runbing XuDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xin-Ran GongDepartment of Environmental Health, Dalian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Dalian, China.
Cheng-Lu WangCentre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jian-Ping LiuCentre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing medical research. However, there is a lack of bibliometric analysis that identifies citation trends shaping the history of this field. This study analyzes the top 100 (T100) most-cited articles on LLMs in medicine to assess their impact and characteristics. Methods: A bibliometric analysis of top-cited articles in the Web of Science database using search terms like "LLMs, generative artificial intelligence, GPT" from 2022 to 2025. Two reviewers identified the T100 papers, extracting publication details, citations, and research themes, adhering to BIBLIO reporting guidelines. Results: The T100 articles had contributed from 655 authors, and 92 articles were published in 2023. Original research constituted the majority of publications (60 articles). Collectively, these works accumulated 14,847 citations, with individual citations ranging from 50 to 1057 (average 148.47). The U.S. led global contributions with 56 articles, Stanford University emerging as the most prolific institution (8 articles). The top seven journals contributed to 31% of the T100, and Conclusion: This analysis provides a core overview of high-impact LLMs research in medicine, guiding future applications. The findings highlighted the remarkable progress in clinical decision support, drug discovery, multimodal medical imaging analysis, and personalized medical information-answering. They also stress the need for prospective trials to assess real-world clinical impacts, boost the reliability of LLMs-generated medical info, develop consensus-driven solutions to address ethical challenges, and launch global initiatives to democratize LLMs tools.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysiscitation analysislarge language modelsmedical research

Identifiers

PMID40949670
PMCPMC12432328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.