ArticleDigital health
From clinics to clicks: Investigating the motivations and competency framework of healthcare professionals on social media.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Quality evaluation of health science popularization short videos related to cerebrovascular diseases on popular short video platforms in China: cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Parental anxiety in China's social media marketing of early orthodontics.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the underlying motivations that prompt healthcare professionals (HCPs) to engage in social-media health communication and to construct a competency framework explaining how they develop and sustain this activity. Methods: We employed grounded theory and qualitative content analysis, conducting semi-structured in-depth interviews with 28 verified HCPs on major Chinese platforms (Douyin, Weibo, Zhihu, Xiaohongshu). Open, axial and selective coding mapped the resulting categories onto the classic Onion Model. Results: Coding generated 237 initial concepts, 33 first-order categories, and eight axial competencies, which were organized into a three-layer competency framework: Motivation layer highlighting intrinsic drivers such as achievement motivation, mission-driven purpose, and constructive responses to burnout; Personal Identity & Roles layer encompassing key traits, evolving role identities, and collaborative teamwork; and Professional Competencies layer covering medical expertise, digital skills, information literacy, and communication proficiency. This framework clarifies how HCPs sustain effective engagement despite tightened regulation and limited financial return. Conclusion: HCPs' presence on social media is driven by intrinsic motivation and enabled by a layered mix of personal and trainable competencies. The proposed framework offers actionable guidance for hospitals, professional bodies and platform operators seeking to design training, recognition and policy mechanisms that foster high-quality, trustworthy digital health communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.